The Correlation between the Dignified Justice Theory and Judges' Considerations in Criminal Cases

The Theory of Dignified Justice, a legal framework rooted in Pancasila and Indonesian cultural values, offers a unique approach to reconciling legal principles with the fundamental respect for human dignity. This study examines its application in judicial decisions, particularly within criminal law. The theory's three distinct layers—meta-meta theory, meta-theory, and legal dogmatics—provide a comprehensive framework for interpreting legal norms and guiding judicial reasoning. While the meta layers offer abstract guidance, legal dogmatics provides concrete principles that judges can apply as a basis for their rulings (ratio decidendi). By exploring the correlation between the Theory of Dignified Justice and judicial reasoning, this study demonstrates how it can guide judges in formulating decisions that adhere to positive law uphold the fundamental principles of human dignity and contribute to social harmony. The compilation of court decisions referencing the theory illustrates its practical relevance, confirming its legitimacy as both a reference and a content of judicial considerations. This suggests that the Theory of Dignified Justice can serve as a valuable tool for promoting Indonesia's more just and equitable legal system.